2020-02-13 - Full MAG Meeting (Conf call)

2020-02-13 - Full MAG Meeting (Conf call)

Date: Thursday 13 February at 20:00 UTC

Objectives

  • Review and agree actions on all currently active work items.

 

Discussion items

Draft document  

Your opinion appreciated 
regarding new modelling pattern
that assures

Zoom Details

https://snomed.zoom.us/j/535528933

Meeting ID: 535 528 933

International numbers available: https://snomed.zoom.us/zoomconference?m=7IB2eW_R_dNG29SLhsAq0sVKH1rcc2dQ

Attendees

 @Peter Williams@Former user (Deleted)@Penni Hernandez (Unlicensed)@stefan.schulz (Unlicensed)@Ed Cheetham , @Yongsheng Gao@Brandon Ulrich (Unlicensed)@Matt Cordell@Daniel Karlsson (Unlicensed)@Guillermo Reynoso@Kai Kewley@Karim Nashar@michael lawley@Former user (Deleted)@Ronald Cornet (Unlicensed)@Former user (Deleted)@Former user (Deleted)@Rob Hausam

Apologies

@Kin Wah Fung (Unlicensed)

Meeting Recording

https://drive.google.com/a/ihtsdo.org/file/d/1Zre7yBlcOFne03WJOh9YfrLBXufb1Ql4/view?usp=sharing

Description

Owner

Time

Notes

Action

Description

Owner

Time

Notes

Action

1

Meeting Introduction

 

@Peter Williams

5

Start recording

Group membership update.

April meeting April 2020 - SNOMED International Business Meetings

1 x solo session 1330 Tuesday (overlap with GA)

1 x joint with Editorial and TRAG 0900 Wednesday

Expected Attendance - arrive Monday night, leave Wednesday.

Travel budget has been approved, please proceed to book travel and accommodation. See also updated Travel Policy.

2

Concrete Domains 

 

@Peter Williams

20

Concrete Domains

SNOMED International Proposal for Representing Concrete Domains in RF2

Roadmap: Specification sign off at the April Business Meeting. implementation ready for Jan 2021 targeting the July 2021 release. Technical preview in Jan 2021.

@Peter Williams follow up with @Former user (Deleted) on representation in MRCM.
@Peter Williams pull in boolean use case as per Singapore implementation. @Ed Cheetham suggested we could use 31874001 |True (qualifier value)| 64100000 |False (qualifier value)| instead. Create page and solicit comment from KK, EC, GR, BU & YG.

@Peter Williams internal discussion on benefits of using concrete values in OWL with conversion back for NNF as interim approach.

Guillermo didn't think that Concrete Domains would have too much impact to existing implementations so better to get new work out ASAP to avoid people starting to use concepts as numbers solution.

PH "Not" cases (eg drug that does not contain paracetamol) that does not helped by having booleans in OWL when disjointness is being described. ML: Negation is independent of concrete domains

3

Recommendations for historical ECL

@Peter Williams

20

Historical Analytics

Volunteers: @Kai Kewley @michael lawley , @Yongsheng Gao , @Daniel Karlsson (Unlicensed) , @Guillermo Reynoso (with an EAG hat on)

 

YG Suggested that a service could be provided to make implementers lives easier here.

YG: Editorial group are looking at historical associations.

4

Sorting order for MRCM

@Yongsheng Gao

10

Internal tooling will support maintenance and publication of MRCM Refset. Sorting will help with consistent representation and identifying duplicates. Looking to use the same approach as per OWL expression sorting. See also canonical normalization process documentation.

Specifically the order in which attributes appear (20:40)

Default view will be to go ahead as per precedent set by OWL unless there are strong opinions.

 

5

Diagram for MRCM

@Ed Cheetham

20

MRCM diagrams

 

6

Deliverables for April Meeting

@Peter Williams

5

Concrete Domains Specification

Concrete Domain Roadmap

Completed Historical Analytics page

Agenda especially for joint session

@Peter Williams Set up page for New Description types eg > 255 characters

Any suggestions from MAG members that they think is important - by 15 March please.

GR interested to see a more complete concept model drawing together various parts - Editorial Guide, OWL, MRCM

 

7

BFO SubGroup

@Former user (Deleted), @stefan.schulz (Unlicensed) , @Daniel Karlsson (Unlicensed) , @michael lawley , @Yongsheng Gao

15

BFO compatibility of Findings / Disorders / Role Groups

Consolidation internally prior to taking back to BFO.

@Yongsheng Gao @Jim Case We should decide if we want this item to appear in the April joint session, or MAG only or EAG only. What I'd like to avoid is having two separate discussions on the same thing.

 

8

AOB / Topics for April

 

0

@Former user (Deleted) annotating concepts in OWL

Consistent interpretation of Role Groups

YG Annotations in OWL and RF2 (link to concept metadata more generally)

 

Insufficient time / Maintenance only

Item

Description

Owner

Time

Notes

Action

Item

Description

Owner

Time

Notes

Action

 

Refset Metadata

 

 

This topic comes from SNOMED on FHIR

Also TRAG item: Reference set metadata See Agenda item 17 and consider in wider context of machine readable metadata item 11

In fact, this metadata may be more widely useful when applied to a module.

Suggestion that we could use the FHIR standard which already defines metadata. DM suggests a JSON format which would be extensible unlike a column based solution.

Where are we at with this? Checking with @Andrew Atkinson ...

 

 

Relationship Grouping

 

 

Google Document, editable

Presentation

OWL file with RGs interpreted as includes

Role group issues

 

 

 

Revisit "Negative Delta"

@Peter Williams

 

At request of EAG - need to revoke/delete a published component. Comments added to Negative Delta.

See TRAG agenda item #

@Peter Williams Write parent page to capture various options in one place. Add pros/cons.

Notify @Andrew Atkinson

@Andrew Atkinson to update critical incident policy to list actions based on particular use cases.

Use cases:

Two groups: where audit is desired (eg technical issue) and where it is not (IP, un-processable characters)

  1. Removing IP - suggestion to blank out particular field ("~") while leaving row.

  2. Conflicting Rows ie no clear state (technical issue, not content) - suggestion to subsequent delta clarifying row.

  3. Clinically dangerous historical error in before-previous release.

 

Review the representation for product role

 

 

2019-April-EAG-Product-Roles.pdf

Discussion of options eg move role concepts into a separate module.

General requirement for flexible composition.

 

Potential Attendees

userlister.notpermitted.viewuserprofile
userlister.notpermitted.viewuserprofile
userlister.notpermitted.viewuserprofile
userlister.notpermitted.viewuserprofile

Meeting Files

Copyright © 2025, SNOMED International