2019-07-15 - Full MAG Meeting (Conf call)

2019-07-15 - Full MAG Meeting (Conf call)

 

Date: Monday 15 July 2019 at 20:00 UTC

Objectives

  • Review and agree actions on all currently active work items.

Discussion items

Description

Owner

Time

Notes

Action

Description

Owner

Time

Notes

Action

1

Meeting Introduction

 

@Peter Williams

8

Start recording

Group membership update.

2

DL Enhancements

@Yongsheng Gao

40

Implementation of punning

Update @Kai Kewley : The member release browser allows browsing stated form using only axioms - http://member-release-browser.ihtsdotools.org

Edition, Modules and Ontology Import Statement - explained in the OWL Guide.

@Yongsheng Gao continue punning discussion on separate calls / email thread.
@Yongsheng Gao to update guidance to improve clarity on handling of OWL header rows.
@Yongsheng Gao circulate updated guidance for feedback.
3

Concrete Domains 

 

@Peter Williams

40

Concrete Domains

SNOMED International Proposal for Representing Concrete Domains in RF2

Uses Cases - Drug strength values, Singapore Drug model also uses Booleans for eg "is Manufactured / is Vaccine" (xsd standard states true ,false)

Potential Impact to vendors / NRCs: DM will continue to deliver existing reference set solution and will release new format in parallel. Differences in Drug Model causing more of a problem eg normalisation of concentration. BU: Not too much of an impact to Singapore and US. Singapore talking about changing existential restriction to assist with drug model.

Roadmap: Consultation Summer 2019 targeting first release July 2020 and concepts-as-numbers inactivation July 2021

@Peter Williams internal discussion on benefits of using concrete values in OWL with conversion back for NNF as interim approach.
Guillermo didn't think that Concrete Domains would have too much impact to existing implementations so better to get new work out ASAP to avoid people starting to use concepts as numbers solution.
4

DL Enhancements impact on Post Coordinated Expressions / ECL

@michael lawley

2

Also concern for FHIR(TS) see agenda item 7.

Will we start using self grouped attributes in ECL? Will "ungrouped" in ECL still match either grouped or ungrouped?

Answer: this is unchanged. Grouped ECL should already match any attribute type that is NOT "never group".

Guidance on role grouping policy required?
5

AOB / Topics for October

 

 

Top Level Ontology BFO discussion@Former user (Deleted)

Suggestion to have sub-group - @Former user (Deleted), @stefan.schulz (Unlicensed) , @Daniel Karlsson (Unlicensed) , @michael lawley , @Yongsheng Gao

@Former user (Deleted) to organise calls. Note that not everyone needs to be involved, please create a page in this space to allow for comments from others (including @Ronald Cornet (Unlicensed) )
@Peter Williams put links to SNOMED criticism.

Insufficient time / Maintenance only

Item

Description

Owner

Time

Notes

Action

Item

Description

Owner

Time

Notes

Action

 

Refset Metadata

 

 

This topic comes from SNOMED on FHIR

Also TRAG item: Reference set metadata See Agenda item 17 and consider in wider context of machine readable metadata item 11

In fact, this metadata may be more widely useful when applied to a module.

Suggestion that we could use the FHIR standard which already defines metadata. DM suggests a JSON format which would be extensible unlike a column based solution.

Where are we at with this? Checking with @Andrew Atkinson ...

 

 

Relationship Grouping

 

 

Google Document, editable

Presentation

OWL file with RGs interpreted as includes

Role group issues

 

 

 

Revisit "Negative Delta"

@Peter Williams

 

At request of EAG - need to revoke/delete a published component. Comments added to Negative Delta.

See TRAG agenda item #

@Peter Williams Write parent page to capture various options in one place. Add pros/cons.

Notify @Andrew Atkinson

@Andrew Atkinson to update critical incident policy to list actions based on particular use cases.

Use cases:

Two groups: where audit is desired (eg technical issue) and where it is not (IP, un-processable characters)

  1. Removing IP - suggestion to blank out particular field ("~") while leaving row.

  2. Conflicting Rows ie no clear state (technical issue, not content) - suggestion to subsequent delta clarifying row.

  3. Clinically dangerous historical error in before-previous release.

 

Review the representation for product role

 

 

2019-April-EAG-Product-Roles.pdf

Discussion of options eg move role concepts into a separate module.

General requirement for flexible composition.

 

Potential Attendees

userlister.notpermitted.viewuserprofile
userlister.notpermitted.viewuserprofile
userlister.notpermitted.viewuserprofile
userlister.notpermitted.viewuserprofile

Attending via Zoom

Apologies

  •  

Previous Meetings

TitleCreatorModified
No content found.

Meeting Files

 

 

Copyright © 2025, SNOMED International