2019-01-14 - Full MAG Meeting (Conf call)

2019-01-14 - Full MAG Meeting (Conf call)

Date: Monday 14 January 2019 - (20:00 - 21:30 UTC) 90 minutes

Objectives

  • Review and agree actions on all currently active work items.

Discussion items

Description

Owner

Time

Notes

Action

Description

Owner

Time

Notes

Action

1

Start GTM Recording

Meeting Introduction and Agenda Review

@Peter Williams

10

Review:

  • Items scheduled for April agenda (see section below)

  • "Done" Items

 

2

Business Meeting, April in London

@Peter Williams

@Yongsheng Gao

10

We've been challenged to free up time and resources, we have the option to not hold a face to face meeting in April.

Closest overlap - Editorial AG?

Deliverables for April meeting:

  • Feedback from January release eg are GCIs consumable and how are their editing capabilities progressing? User feedback perhaps via TRAG?

Demonstrating business value of open ended, future facing non-concrete discussion.

Option for single half day session for April, more time available in October.

Country capability matrix?

Secondary reasons to travel:

 Brandon Ulrich (bulrich)



 Daniel Karlsson (dkarlsson)

FHIR, CMAG, Member Forum, Observables, Cancer Reporting

 Guillermo Reynoso (greynoso)

EAG

 Harold Solbrig (hsolbrig)

TRAG, FHIR

 Kin-Wah Fung (kfung)

Devices, Allergies (irregular)

 Michael Lawley (mlawley)

FHIR, TRAG

 Peter G. Williams (pwilliams)

FHIR

 Peter Hendler (phendler)

Clinical Engagement

 Ronald Cornet (rcornet)



 STEFAN SCHULZ (sschulz)



 Yongsheng Gao (ygao)



 

Also Dion - TRAG, Member Forum

3

DL Enhancements Feedback and Progress

@Yongsheng Gao

10

  • In the July 2019 release all stated relationships from the previous release will be published as inactive and the complete OWL axiom refset will be the source of truth.

  • Update re January release

  • Update of SNOMED International Tooling Enhancements

 

  • Archived Documents:

Description Logic Enhancements - Briefing Paper

@Kai Kewley to ensure documentation for Classification Service details what can and should be specified in the Stated Relationship file when working in a hybrid fashion. UPDATE: See https://github.com/IHTSDO/snomed-owl-toolkit#stated-relationships-and-axioms
@Yongsheng Gao to ensure July release clearly states that loading then OWL Ontology Refset into the classifier is obligatory for correct classification.

Will distribute both OWL refsets in single file.

4

OWL Refset Specification

@Yongsheng Gao

10

Update :

1. Enhancement for syntax restriction

2. Representation of role group in OWL and inferred relationship file

 

  • Current published version of document:

SNOMED CT OWL Guide

ALL review document by 18 April at which point if there are no outstanding issue it will be published.
Future discussion on moving away from sequential integers for role group numbers.
@Yongsheng Gao resolve must/exceptions conflict in section 2.4.5. Also highlight use of own module is in extension modifications.
GR Asked for format of GCI rows in OWL refset to be clearly documented - action item (Yong will update the guide)
5

Specification for OWL file

@Former user (Deleted)

10

  • Requirements and use cases

  • Journal paper on SNOMED OWL

@Peter Williams set up page for collaboration
@Former user (Deleted) to progress for April Meeting
6

Definition status

@Yongsheng Gao

5

 

7

Concrete Domains Roadmap

@Yongsheng Gao

10

RoadMap for concrete domains: Concrete Domain

  • Achievable timescale

  • Changes required / impact to end users

 

8

Discuss April agenda

AOB

All

10

Daniel to prepare Relationship Grouping Discussion (with Stefan, Yong, Harold)

Guillermo: DL tooling changes causing issues - somewhat alleviated by use of SNOMED OWL Toolkit. MRCM Refsets are a pain point eg when a domain is widened by NRC - requires 4 new refsets, the changes of which will not update automatically from the International Edition. Interaction of MRCM with OWL classification somewhat "magical". Current process is not working due to lack of inheritance. YG observes that the MRCM input is only required during this transition from Stated Relationships to OWL and will not still be needed

 

No Time - Schedule for April

Description

Owner

Time

Notes

Action

Description

Owner

Time

Notes

Action

1

DL Enhancements impact on Post Coordinated Expressions

 

 

Also concern for FHIR(TS) see agenda item 7.

 

2

Classification Service, SNOMED OWL Toolkit and generation of NNF

@Kai Kewley

@Yongsheng Gao

 

Classification Service with documentation available in GitHub

ALL to review NNF documentation to be considered approved.
@Yongsheng Gao to include discussion on why GCIs are not represented in the NNF.
3

Refset Metadata

@Peter Williams

 

This topic comes from SNOMED on FHIR

Also TRAG item: Reference set metadata

In fact, this metadata may be more widely useful when applied to a module.

Use cases: Public Library of Simple Refsets, ?

Two separate situations:

  • Human information like what is the refset to be used for, who owns it, etc.

  • Missing technical information eg what is the target code system of a map, keys vs data, machine searchable fields.

Suggestion that we could use the FHIR standard which already defines metadata. DM suggests a JSON format which would be extensible unlike a column based solution.

There is a more general desirable case to be able to annotate various components.

 

4

Proximal Primitive Parent modelling vs Immediate Parent

@Dion McMurtrie

@michael lawley

 

"Modeling Content Using More Than Proximal Primitives (201739)"

 

5

Terminology management evolution

@Yongsheng Gao

 

Items arising from Saturday meetings:

QA for that module would also need to be shared.

 

Maintenance Tasks - No further discussion required

 

Facilitating Namespace owner lookups

@Peter Williams

 

Facilitating Namespace Lookups

Use cases:

  • Extension maintainer wishes to raise modelling issue with originator of concept

@Peter Williams remove authentication from specific namespace lookup
@Peter Williams progress providing a permanent location that is not implementation dependent. Check FHIR Namespace resource for this.

Logic Profile Specification

@Dion McMurtrie

 

SNOMED CT Logic Profile Specification - Status: Published

Dion - happy with list of datatypes against common classifier capabilities?

 

Working with Historical Associations

@Peter Williams

 

Working with Historical Associations

 

See also TIG 5.2.1.4 Association Reference Set

@Former user (Deleted) to update TIG to make it clear that the target id field is mutable (colour currently green ie yes, but text says "no").
@Peter Williams remove RVF validation that is complaining about such re-use.

Copyright © 2025, SNOMED International