2016-04-18 & 19 Face to Face Meeting, London

Session 1 (Monday 18 April 13:30 Trafalgar)

13:30 - 15:30 (120 mins)

• Welcome/Introductions

• Context for meeting

• Location/timing of future face to face meetings

• Quality Assurance Published Papers Roundup

RTU

30

MRCM review/update - presentation & discussion

LBI

60

Information Modeling perspective: How should IHTSDO go about formulating guidance on using SNOMED with information models? Need an approach for developing the content/substance of the guidance (not referring to the standards process).

LBI

30

Break (30 Mins)

16:00 - 17:00 (60 mins)

SNOMED as OWL 2 EL (Part 1 of 2); IHTSDO to develop a standards document to describe

• Supported use cases

• The proposed logic model

• SNOMED-specific editorial guidance on using the logic constructs

• Editorial constraints on which constructs may be used in which areas of the terminology

RTU

60

Session 2 (Tuesday 18 April 09:00 Canterbury)

09:00 - 10:30 (90 mins)

RF2 to OWL script - update

HS

30

SNOMED as OWL 2 EL (Part 2); Roadmap, implications, stakeholder expectations, limitations, timeline.

RTU

60

Break (30 mins)

11:00 - 12:00 (60)

Demo/explanation of QA evaluation; plans for operationalising (see qa.snomed.org)

RTU

20

Approaches to standardizing modeling practice and models across SNOMED clinical domains (Clinical/terminologist perspective, tooling use case)

• Are there critical areas, and if so how do we identify them? Priorities?

• How to define concept models in critical areas (if any)?

• How to compute (divine?) the scope of the work?

20

Patrik Eklund: “SNOMED's logical foundation is too shallow for practical applications”

RTU

10

Other business

10