| | | | |
|---|
1 | Welcome and role call | @Bruce Goldberg | | |
3 | Injuries - continued | @Bruce Goldberg, @Yongsheng Gao | | |
3 | Complications of procedure | @Bruce Goldberg , @Jim Case | | |
4 | Reconsider fetal-maternal modeling | @Phil Brown | Need to re-review @Phil Brown's previous proposal for agreement on how to proceed The Netherlands are having translation issues with concepts that could be considered either fetal or maternal findings/disorders (and also affecting the Situation hierarchy). The SCT to ICD-10 map also has inconsistencies. There are trackers: An example given was 199549009 |Fetus with drug damage - delivered (disorder)|. They're asking if the concepts say 'delivered,' does this mean it's a concept for the mother's record? Otherwise, if a fetus is delivered, then it is no longer a fetus; however, it's a child of 70591005 |Fetal disorder (disorder)|. I think I remember Australia having recent issues with this as well. Is this on an upcoming work plan? ECE? I don't see anything in the Ed Guide regarding subject of record in this context? Response from @Phil Brown - In relation to the concept Fetus with drug damage - delivered - I suspect it originates or relates to O35.5 (I didn’t have access to the cross references I think on the SCT browser) Maternal care for (suspected) damage to fetus by drugs But I think it means that the drug damage occurred whilst the delivered neonate was intra-uterine i.e. a fetus; So the concept probably means Disorder of neonate Due to Drug damage to foetus
| |
5 | Pregnancy/labor/delivery function observables | @Bruce Goldberg | | |
6 | Dupuytren disease and contracture | @Bruce Goldberg | | |
7 | AOB, adjourn | ALL | | |