Fracture of [bone structure] (disorder) - v1.0
Status | In PROD |
|---|---|
Version | 1.0 |
Latest version |
Descriptions:
Term | description type | Language/acceptability | Language/acceptability | Case significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
[Periods of life] [Fracture morphology] of [bone structure] (disorder) | FSN | us:P | gb:P | ci |
[Periods of life] [Fracture morphology] of [bone structure] | SYN | us:P | gb:P | ci |
Concept model:
Attribute Cardinality | Attribute | Value | role group number | Attribute Group Cardinality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1..1 | 0 |
N/A | ||
1..1 | [Fracture morphology] | 1 |
1..* | |
1..1 | [bone structure] | 1 | ||
0..1 | [Periods of life] | 1 |
Definition status:
Applies To:
<< 125605004 |Fracture of bone (disorder)|
Rules for description generation:
Remove the semantic tag, e.g. (body structure)
Remove 'Structure of' from [body structure] if term starts with 'Structure of' e.g. 709530002|Structure of phalanx of hand (body structure)|
Remove 'structure' from [body structure] if term contains 'structure', e.g. 69536005|Head structure (body structure)| 24097009|Bone structure of hand (body structure)|
Hi @Yongsheng Gao @Kai Kewley I'd like to add a section to these pages, something like "Application" or "Applies To" and then have a list of concepts, from which point down this template can be applied. So in this case that would be << 125605004 |Fracture of bone (disorder)|
I don't think it's possible to determine that information from this page as it stands? I'd also like to represent that in the JSON. The immediate use case is to allow automation of checking for template conformance in the appropriate sub-hierarchies. A secondary use case would be in the form of Author Decision Support so that we could offer the user the appropriate template(s) for what they're working on once we know the parent (interesting workflow / UI implication there that we'd need to be told the immediate parent but the template will assert the proximal primitive eg Disorder).
I didn't want to just make that change because I heard Yong say there was already some code to generate the JSON from these confluence pages?