Burn of [body structure] (disorder) - v1.0
Status | In PROD |
|---|---|
Version | 1.0 |
Latest version |
Descriptions:
Term | description type | Language/acceptability | Language/acceptability | Case significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Burn of [body structure] (disorder) | FSN | us:P | gb:P | ci |
Burn of [body structure] | SYN | us:P | gb:P | ci |
Concept model:
Attribute Cardinality | Attribute | Value | role group number | Role Group Cardinality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1..1 | {"timestamp":1791215038662,"msg":"A unknown Exception Occurred","errorMsg":"The provided AtlassianHostUser did not specify a user to act as.","code":"500"} | {"timestamp":1791215038616,"msg":"A unknown Exception Occurred","errorMsg":"The provided AtlassianHostUser did not specify a user to act as.","code":"500"} | 0 | N/A |
1..1 | {"timestamp":1791215038648,"msg":"A unknown Exception Occurred","errorMsg":"The provided AtlassianHostUser did not specify a user to act as.","code":"500"} | {"timestamp":1791215038653,"msg":"A unknown Exception Occurred","errorMsg":"The provided AtlassianHostUser did not specify a user to act as.","code":"500"} | 1 |
1..* |
1..1 | {"timestamp":1791215038644,"msg":"A unknown Exception Occurred","errorMsg":"The provided AtlassianHostUser did not specify a user to act as.","code":"500"} | [body structure] {"timestamp":1791215038687,"msg":"A unknown Exception Occurred","errorMsg":"The provided AtlassianHostUser did not specify a user to act as.","code":"500"} | 1 |
Definition status:
{"timestamp":1791215038633,"msg":"A unknown Exception Occurred","errorMsg":"The provided AtlassianHostUser did not specify a user to act as.","code":"500"}
Applies To:
{"timestamp":1791215038627,"msg":"A unknown Exception Occurred","errorMsg":"The provided AtlassianHostUser did not specify a user to act as.","code":"500"}
Rules for description generation:
JIRA tickets
https://projects.jira.snomed.org/browse/INFRA-3184
Comments
I was trying to constrain it because there are other templates for subtypes of burn injury (e.g. full thickness; partial thickness), and I am deferring "types" of burns, e.g. (chemical, lightning). But this may need to be reconsidered.
Hi Penni Hernandez (Unlicensed) Do you know if there's a separate template or issue for first/second/third degree chemical burn? All I can find in IHTSDO-810 (artf6238) Burns is that they present a modelling challenge (in which I concur...).
Should this have an ASSOCIATED MORPHOLOGY range of <<48333001 |Burn injury (morphologic abnormality)|? Or is this restricted to solely FSNs with just "burn" in it?