E2O 19th meeting 20211103

E2O 19th meeting 20211103

Date

2021-11-03 15.00 UTC

Attendees

Jim Campbell Yongsheng Gao Karim Nashar Daniel Karlsson Alejandro Lopez Osornio Former user (Deleted)

Apologies

 

Objectives

  • Continue to elaborate the migration model for laboratory measurement procedures

Discussion items

Item

Description

Time

Owner

Notes

Action

Item

Description

Time

Owner

Notes

Action

1

Welcome

 

Daniel Karlsson

  • DO NOT FORGET TO RECORD!

2

Conflicts of interest

 

Daniel Karlsson

 

 

3

Discussion Phase 1 dataset for migration trial

57 min

Jim Campbell

Former user (Deleted)

Daniel Karlsson

  • Review of progress with conversion file for UK labs

  • Modelling issues suggested by classification of Phase 1 migration set 

  • Followup on issues from last meeting:

    • Timed specimens shall be identified by instance time stamp of acquisition 

    • 24 hour urine testing deferred to committee deliberation

  • Red cell indices such as Mean corpuscular volume. Representation of averages (or any aggregation) has not yet been finally agreed on,proceed with proposed model

  • Anti-mitocondrial antobody pattern, Leukocyte ALP → items deferred to Observables deliberation

  • Agglutination test. Property = Presence, , Technique = Latex agglutination

  • Titre. How to represent titre in relation to presence and quantity concentration; deferred to committee

  • Von Willebrand factor activity - likely a process observable and out of scope.

  • Produce an OWL file based on decisions made and compare hierarchy of reclassified Observables to Evaluation procedures.

2021-11-03:

  • Jim Campbell work since last time.

  • DK: additional, the differences found between the Evalualtion procedure hierarchy and the E2O Observable hierarchy have highlighted issues with the Evaluation procedure hierarchy.

  • Discussion about future progress of E2O

  • UK current decision is to use Procedures in the context of ordering

    • There would in the UK content not be duplicates between "ordering" and "result" concepts.

  • Keeping two hierarchies with essentially the same meaning introduces maintenance challenges

  • There would be modeling solutions to keep hierarchies in sync, IFF it is possible to write clear guidance on when to use which hierarchy

 Daniel Karlsson Bring up generic aggregate observable topic on a future Observables meeting.

4

Next meeting 

2 min

Daniel Karlsson

 

 

5

AOB

1 min

Daniel Karlsson

 

 

Meeting Files

Recording

 

Previous Meetings

 

Copyright © 2026, SNOMED International