2017-08-21 - OBSERVABLE Meeting

1

Welcome & apologies

@Daniel Karlsson

2

Conflicts of interest

@Daniel Karlsson

• None stated

3

Previous minutes

@Daniel Karlsson

4

Observables MRCM updates

@Suzanne Santamaria

• Farzaneh: has there been a shift in use of INHERES IN for process observables?

• Cardinalities > 0..1

• Definition update

• @Daniel Karlsson look at process observable examples for use of INHERES IN

5

LOINC collaboration

@Suzanne Santamaria

@Farzaneh Ashrafi

+all

• LOINC issues

  • Discussion items posted on OIMP discussion board:

    • Age

    • Anatomical site

    • Likelihood

• Everyone: review the discussion items for discussion next meeting

• Age: two alternative representations (1) age a property (2) process observable, property = duration, characterizes = life, ...

• Anatomical site: is a specific property type needed? E.g. "location of BP measurement" could be "home" or "left upper arm".

• Likelihood: in LOINC (almost always) associated with risk and prognosis.

6

Findings vs. Observables

@Former user (Deleted)

• See presentation

7

Next meeting(s)

@Daniel Karlsson

• Next meeting is not 2017-09-04 due to Labor Day

  • Findings vs. Observables discussion

  • LOINC issues (Age, site, likelihood)

• @Daniel Karlsson send out doodle for next meeting (Labor Day)

8

AOB

@Daniel Karlsson