Editorial guide: review of the newly revised editorial guide.
Dear CMAG members,
The revamped editorial guide is ready for your review.
Each of you will be receiving a google sheet with detailed instructions and guidance as to the review process.
The feedback is due May 25th.
Comments
@Camilla Wiberg Danielsen, I've updated the PDF on that page which now reflects the updated/new content .
Thanks Rory,
Is the PDF (dated 2018-05-14) and the online version on the left (dated 2018-Apr-19) the same now? The dates are different, but the content can of course be the same. Please be very clear if the are the same and in case they are not, which one you want us to review. /Camilla
It represents and is the same as the content that you are seeing on the site. The date is just the date that the PDF was generated, apologies for the confusion!
Hi,
I'm confuse too...
When I look at the Table of Contents from the web page section Part II: Authoring , there are 4 rubriques, and if I look at the PDF Table of Contents, Part II: Authoring has 6 rubriques...
Can you confirm which version should be checked?
Thank you!
Hi @Linda Parisien, I can again confirm this is the same data. The PDF has simply generated some extra headings in the table of content based on page formatting. The content, however, is the same.
Hi Monica,
Just to be absolutely sure about the correct version of the EG. In the page https://snomed.atlassian.net/wiki/display/DraftEGR/SNOMED+CT+Editorial+Guide that you provided in your Google sheet there is a PDF version from 2017-03-08 which is a bit confusing as the latest version of the EG seems to be from 2018-01-31? It is in this page https://confluence.ihtsdotools.org/display/DOCEG.
At the left side of the screen there is an online version from 2018-04-19. I suppose this is the one you want us to review. /Camilla