2026-04-30: DEUSG Virtual
Meeting Details
Date & Time: 30th April 2026, 11am UTC
Objectives
Users' discussions about the SNOMED International Drug Model and National Drug Extension Model.
Zoom Link
Link: DEUSG Zoom Meeting Link
Meeting Recording
Please note there was a error with generation of the video recording for this meeting. Zoom AI summary of the meeting is available at the bottom of this page.
Attendees:
Alejandro Lopez Osornio, Shane Byrnes, Yongsheng Gao, Monica Harry, Dion McMurtrie, Karin Drivenes, Ana Paredes, Colin Macfarlane, Elisabeth Serrot, Emilie Nguyen, Francois Lavoie, Guillermo Reynoso, Hanne Johansen, Jerry O’Sullivan, Julie Boutin, Justin Stout, Karen Rees, Laura Solana, Linda Bird, Nick McGraw, Noelle Horan, Patrick McLaughlin, Shane Doyle, Stuart Abbott, Tara Kelly, Paul Wright, Michael Keary.
Discussion items:
Description | Mins | Owner | Notes & Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Opening | 1 min | Shane | Welcome
|
| 2 | Drug Model Implementation Guide | 1 min | Alejandro | Please continue to feedback on draft. Feedback can be via the forums post, or if you have more detailed feedback you can download a pdf of a section, comment/annotate, and return to Alejandro. |
| 3 | Substances linkage to organisms | 20 min | Yongsheng / Farzaneh | Questions to the group on use-cases and required scope - to ensure the substances work in this area is focused on addressing priority use-cases. In Meeting: Please add comments and questions to working document which is identifying and looking at challenging areas: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d84Iv_eHQ3kFOB7fItVs3k2aftB4u_hm4SpUMdLdHBk/edit?usp=sharing |
| 4 | Dose Form after transformation | 25 min | Yongsheng / Karen |
Presentation Slides: Available for download from File Attachments at end of this page. |
| 5 | Intended Site v Route of Administration - Deferred | 5 min | Shane / Alejandro | Multiple perspectives on scope and implementation approaches across the group. Current pattern/approach will hold - allows focus on higher priority areas identified by group members. When a defining use-case arises we can work through options, and collate a business case for change. |
| 6 | Rounding - Deferred | 5 min | Shane / Alejandro | Question to National Drug Extensions to confirm acceptance of rounding proposal and revert on the forums post: https://forums.snomed.org/t/non-terminating-strength-rounding-rules/943/6 If the proposal is to be implemented as a standard set of rules, please let us know:
We will collate the responses to a table to summarise the output of group members. |
Zoom AI generated summary of the meeting |
|---|
Summary Forum Feedback on Implementation GuideThe meeting involved brief discussions about recording tools and updates on forum feedback. It was mentioned that feedback is open for discussion in a forum post and it is encouraged for everyone to contribute. Substance Classification DiscussionThe team discussed generating summaries and questions for project documents using AI, with work on business case documents and briefing notes for coverage and clarification needs. They explored different approaches to defining cannabis substances, including a phased approach where DNA/RNA links might be straightforward while plant products linked to organisms may require more investigation. The team identified key challenges around substance classification, including the difficulty of defining all chemical compounds and the distinction between substance groups and physical objects in the SEP model. Natural Products Model DiscussionThe team discussed a model for natural products and substance-organism linkages, with Canada mentioning existing research backed by existing papers. Concerns were expressed about the top-down analysis approach used in the original drug model design and emphasized the importance of using real data from databases, particularly those in Canada that use UNII codes. The group agreed to analyze Canada’s document as a starting point and gather real-world data to guide the scope of their work, rather than defining abstractions first. Medicinal Cannabis Product Modeling ApproachesThe team discussed modeling approaches for medicinal cannabis products and dose forms. Australia shared insights from an 18-month project in Australia involving industry consultation on medicinal cannabis products, which could inform the current discussion. The group then reviewed options for modeling dose forms, particularly focusing on a reconstituted Diamox example where a 500mg powder is transformed into a 5mg per milliliter injection solution. Two modeling approaches were proposed: using new attributes for administrative dose forms or enhancing FSN terminology to clearly distinguish reconstituted products from manufactured products. The team agreed that FSN descriptions need to be explicit about both manufactured presentation strengths and concentration strengths of transformed products. Pharmaceutical Product Modeling ConceptsThe group discussed modeling concepts for pharmaceutical products, particularly focusing on how to represent manufactured dose forms and their administrable counterparts. Australia suggested using separate concepts for the powder and reconstituted solution forms rather than trying to model both states in a single concept. An alternative proposed using dual axioms to represent both the powder presentation strength and the concentration strength of the reconstituted solution. The discussion highlighted the need to balance international terminology standards with local regulatory requirements, with participants noting that different countries may have different approaches to strength representation and dilution requirements. The group agreed to continue research and further discussion in future meetings to better understand how to accommodate these realities in their modeling approach. |