2018-08-15 - SLPG Meeting
Date & Time
20:00 UTC Wednesday 15th August 2018
Teleconference Details
To join the meeting please go to https://snomed.zoom.us/j/471420169.
Further information can be found at SLPG meeting information
Goals
URI standard
Review use cases for computable language instance URI
Review language instance URIs
Proposed language features
Transitive relationships in ECL
Ability to execute maps from within ECL
Attendees
Chair: @Former user (Deleted)
Project Group: @Ed Cheetham, @michael lawley, @Former user (Deleted), @Rob Hausam, @Anne Randorff Højen
Apologies
Agenda and Meeting Notes
Description | Owner | Notes |
|---|---|---|
Welcome and apologies | @Former user (Deleted) |
|
URI Specification | @Former user (Deleted) |
|
Proposed Language Features | @Former user (Deleted) | Other topics for discussion. For example:
|
Query Language
| @Former user (Deleted) | Examples: version and language
Notes
|
| Examples: where
Notes
| |
Keywords for Term-based searching:
Additional Syntactic Sugar
| ||
Language preferences using multiple language reference sets
| ||
Other topics | @Former user (Deleted) |
|
Confirm next meeting date/time | @Former user (Deleted) | The next SLPG meeting will be held in 4 weeks at 20:00 UTC on Wednesday 12th September (to avoid the MAG meeting in 2 weeks). |
With the talk yesterday of historical relationships (recognising the interplay between inactive identifiers and their active counterparts), I'm wondering about the expression representation (and thus the SCG implications) for ambiguous identifiers in situations where active substitutions have been made as part of (normalisation) preparations for analysis.
This may already be addressed in training materials, but put simply, is there an anticipated need for the SCG - when used to serialise the result of a historical substitution (and any subsequent normalisation of those substitute codes) - to include an 'OR' operator?
Say, for example, I encounter the (recently-inactivated) 193515006 | Exudative cyst of iris or anterior chamber (disorder) in a record. Tracing this into the active data (which I may wish to do for analysis purposes) I find it could now be:
82167006 | Exudative cyst of anterior chamber (disorder)
OR
53866004 | Exudative cyst of iris (disorder)
Now I may have access to description information that allows me to resolve this to a single identifier, but if I don't (and in many circumstances I won't) then I'm stuck with the disjunction 82167006 OR 53866004 (and whatever this becomes through normalisation) as my new 'expression', and potentially need to hold/communicate this in a single field/element/whatever.
The SCG's '+' operator handles the multiple concept references that can be generated by normalisation, but there's nothing to support disjunction generated by historical substitution.
As I say, apols if this is already covered somewhere. If so, please point me there, if not - thoughts?
Thanks
Ed