Welcome and introductions

5

@Peter Williams

@Rob Hausam

Recording + Notes.

October Business Meeting (Working Group)

and Expo presentations

5

@Jane Millar

• Check slot for Jeremy's presentation.

• Check timing for working meeting possibly after presentations.

Summary of previous week

5

@Peter Williams

Summary of previous week:

• 2018-09-11 - SNOMED on FHIR Meeting (TS)

Presentation on FHIR CIMI & SOLOR

70

@Former user (Deleted)

@Susan Matney

Presentation

Vital Signs

10

@Daniel Karlsson

Vital Signs Resource

Jeremy's work to compare Vital signs profile and SNOMED Subhierarchy - issues with eg blood pressure. Complex expression constraints available which cover the use of observables by the NHS(UK). Mapping to LOINC codes.

See Spreadsheet attached to: SNOMED on FHIR Meeting (TB) - Tuesday 21 August 2018

Issues / Discussion :

• Normative vs. descriptive purpose - 1, 2, or 3 profiles?

• Unresolved modeling issues
  
  

v3.0.1

ProcedureRequest

ReferralRequest

v3.4.0 (publication Aug 19?)

ServiceRequest

5

@Daniel Karlsson

Neither of these exist in the FHIR 3.0.1 Spec. @Rob Hausam

http://build.fhir.org/servicerequest.html → ServiceRequest

Questions:

• What determines which FHIR resource to use: the location of the data item in the sending system’s information model, or the semantics of the particular code regardless of where it was found? Some hybrid of both?

• If the resource to be used is determined at least partly by the location in the sending information model, how does a requesting system cope with the fact that different implementations (or different users of the same implementation) both can and do secrete essentially the same clinical info in very different parts of the host information model?

Next meeting

5

@Peter Williams

Tuesday 2 October 2018 (Hl7 Meeting - Baltimore - possibility for overlap?)

Follow up to CIMI/SOLAR Discussion.