Date/Time

20:00 UTC on Tuesday 13 March 2018 - 90 minutes.

Objectives

Bindings to FHIR Clinical Resources (e.g. value set bindings)

Meeting Details

Online: https://snomed.zoom.us/my/snomedhl7

Phone: See https://zoom.us/zoomconference for available phone numbers (meeting id 242-348-6949)

Chat: https://chat.snomedtools.org/channel/snomed-fhir
(instructions and guide here - Getting Started with Rocket Chat)

Attendees

Rob Hausam, Peter Williams, Former user (Deleted), Andrew Perry (Unlicensed), Anne Randorff Højen, Former user (Deleted), Jim Case, Michael Hosking (Unlicensed), Peter Jordan (Unlicensed), Yongsheng Gao, michael lawley, Susan Matney (Unlicensed), Former user (Deleted)

Apologies

Daniel Karlsson, Jane Millar

Meeting Recording

https://snomed.zoom.us/recording/play/v96ABAch5q7CNDCbVUb1IduC5xNtpgF8e2-BsksL1RGWh5lUKtbQ1qAvVKO0fKZJ

Discussion items

	Description	Mins	Owner	Notes & Actions

	Description	Mins	Owner	Notes & Actions
1	Welcome and introductions	5	Peter Williams Rob Hausam	Recording + Notes.
2	Summary of previous week	5	Peter Williams Rob Hausam	Summary of previous week: 2018-03-06 - SNOMED on FHIR Meeting (TS)
3	Profile for Specimen Resouce	65	Daniel Karlsson	Specimen binding Suggestion from Jim Case that the type attribute would be better bound to (< Substance plus < Morphologic Abnormality plus < Physical Object (or selection thereof)) rather than Specimen as it avoids any potential conflict with the other attributes and is effectively opening up post coordination, rather than sticking to a inherently restricted set of pre-coordinated concepts. Similarly (Former user (Deleted)), the method attribute is currently a selection of SNOMED CT concepts plus a V2 valueset. Two main options: Use Specimen hierarchy for "type" and then constrain what can appear in the other fields (and how we deal with conflict!) Put all information into a post coordinated expression in the "type" attribute (Jim Case noted that some aspects - like the shipping container - may not be characteristics intrinsic to the specimen). Jim Case also suggested that using these decomposed fields would only be used outside of a SNOMED context. Otherwise could be achieved - (PWI: more safely due to MRCM) - with post coordinated. Rob Hausam to seek opinion from Riki Merrick
4	ValueSets	10	Daniel Karlsson	How do we produce and publish ValueSets? Tools?
5	Molecular Pathology harmonising V2 and FHIR Datasets.		Jim Campbell	Molecular Pathology harmonising V2 and FHIR Datasets Jim Campbell to provide further detail in page above. Peter Williams No further detail has been forthcoming, remove from agenda.
6	Next TB meeting	5		27 March 2018

Meeting Files

There are currently no attachments on this page.

2018-03-13 - SNOMED on FHIR Meeting (TB)