Problem Concept Inactivations:
The purpose of this page is for team members to list 5 - 10 concepts which they have found difficult/impossible to allocate to a current inactivation reason/association type. These should be recorded within the comments box below, one comment box to each team member.
Where possible please annotate each of the concepts within your list with the reason why you found it difficult to choose an inactivation reason.
Many thanks, Paul
Comments
@Krista Lilly, I think we need a bit more info on this. There are a couple of options based on the particulars of the procedure.
I'll post concept IDs for any new ones I run across. This scenario was from memory, but I don't remember the procedure.
General comment - in the Medicinal product hierarchy, we would have liked to have had the option to use Non-conformance with editorial policy (for concepts that were out of scope) in combination with the Possibly equivalent to historical relationship (1 or more but generally only 1).
I had a procedure concept that had literature only from the 1950's; the procedure had failed repeatedly and was subsequently abandoned from being performed. When I inactivated the concept, the Outdated inactivation reason would require a replacement. What replacement concept should be used in a situation like this (or does it make sense to require one)?