2022 Changes to the Universal Definition and Classification of Heart Failure - Impact on SNOMED CT
4th March 2022: Please be advised SNOMED International is putting on hold any changes in this area while concerns raised from members are investigated and further clarity obtained on how this is to be handled internationally by WHO.
Summary
Please see attached briefing note.
Relevant documents
Actions:
Date | Requested action | Requester(s) | Response required by: | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
24 Jan 2022 | Response on attached briefing note | @Elaine Wooler | @Camilla Wiberg Danielsen Feb 21, 2022 Heart failure feedback @Anna Harasim Feb 21, 2022 Heart failure feedback @Elze de Groot Feb 21, 2022 Heart failure feedback @Linda Parisien Feb 21, 2022 Heart failure feedback @susannaprnn Feb 21, 2022 Heart failure feedback @Former user (Deleted) Feb 21, 2022 Heart failure feedback @Jostein Ven Feb 21, 2022 Heart failure feedback @Theresa Barry Feb 21, 2022 Heart failure feedback @Libby Antoun Feb 21, 2022 Heart failure feedback @Katrien Scheerlinck (Unlicensed) Feb 21, 2022 Heart failure feedback @Eugene Viacrucis Feb 21, 2022 Heart failure feedback | Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments. |
Links
Country response
Country | Date | Response |
---|---|---|
USA | 23JAN2022 | I am afraid there is not a good solution to this problem. Essentially, the current concept is for "A or B". We can retire it and create "A" and "B", which will be disruptive for analytics – 2 queries needed for before and after the change. Or we can transform "A or B" into "A alone" and create B, which seems less disruptive, but will muddy the analytical waters. The continuation of "A or B" into "A alone" will result in queries for this concept that return different cohorts depending on when the query was made ("A or B" before the change, "A alone" after). Regardless of the solution, it looks like such changes require careful documentation and education. Also, this type of change is not uncommon – it has been seen many times in the UMLS Metathesaurus. Such changes should be handled uniformly, not on a case-by-case basis. From an editorial perspective, SNOMED International should have a policy about such changes and how to handle them. |
Norway | 01.02.2022 | We prefer option 1, if this entails the creation of the 4 concepts. It is very important that the resulting hierarchy under Heart failure is consistent. |
UK | 09.02.2022 | This has been discussed and feedback will be provided by Emma via Member Forum. |
The Netherlands | 9-2-2022 | We prefer option 2, it's the most consistent solution and in line with the authoring guides. |
Australia | 20220221 | Our preference is Option 2. We do note that either option will have significant work in Terminology especially with regards to modelling as these changes will also have an impact on its descendants. We also note that the affected concepts appear in several of our reference sets. Will there be a remodeling of the attribute |Finding site - Left cardiac ventricular structure| once the synonym |Left ventricular failure| is inactivated? We also note that the terms 364006 |Acute left-sided heart failure (disorder)| and 111283005 |Chronic left-sided heart failure (disorder)| have the |Finding site - Left cardiac ventricular structure|. With the creation of new concepts |Left heart failure| and |Right heart failure|, are you looking at modelling it with Finding site - 17398003 |Structure of left side of heart| and 79561009 |Structure of right side of heart|, respectively? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member countries without a CMAG rep |
|
|
CMAG response
Date | CMAG Response | Next steps |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final outcome:
Date:
Copyright © 2025, SNOMED International