Under care of 'professional' (finding) content
Summary
Under care of <professional> (finding) content is being considered for inactivation (with return the relevant extension where applicable) as it is seen as realm specific content. The meaning of the term used to represent the clinician or service may vary between countries. Prior to undertaking this step the CMAG is being asked if this demotion of content would cause an issue for members.
Please see the subtypes under the following concepts:
Under care of team (finding)
Under care of person (finding)
Under care of service (finding)
Actions:
Date | Requested action | Requester(s) | Response required by: | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requested 11th April 2018. | Please advise if the demotion of this content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country. | @Cathy Richardson | @Camilla Wiberg Danielsen May 4, 2018 Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country. @Daniel Karlsson May 4, 2018 Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country. @Elaine Wooler May 4, 2018 Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country. @Elze de Groot May 4, 2018 Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country. @Former user (Deleted) May 4, 2018 Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country. @Linda Parisien May 4, 2018 Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country. @Matt Cordell May 4, 2018 Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country. @Former user (Deleted) May 4, 2018 Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country. @Jostein Ven May 4, 2018 Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country. @Former user (Deleted) May 4, 2018 Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country. @Theresa Barry May 4, 2018 Please advise if the demotion of Under care of <professional> finding content to the relevant extensions would cause an issue for your country. | Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments. |
Relevant documents
Links
2018-04-11 - CMAG Meeting: Face to face in London, England
PCP-49: Under care of <professional>Completed
Country response
Country | Date | Response |
|---|---|---|
Sweden | 2018-04-23 | Has nothing in the extension in this group. Also, no content in our maintained and under-development refests. |
Denmark | 2018-04-25 | Not in use in Denmark. |
UK | 2018-04-26 | Is there any further information on the decision around this please. I've looked at the tracker which states "Ed Panel decision: Pattern not accepted, considered to be realm specific especially with respect to social care." We have extension content in this space and there is a significant amount of core content that is not realm specific e.g. 305439002 | Under care of counselor (finding), 305485004 | Under care of geneticist (finding), 305613006 | Under care of physiotherapist (finding). Is this content also to be retired or just the realm specific? |
NZ | 2018-05-01 | No concerns raised in New Zealand |
AU | 2018-05-03 | I'm not aware of any sites using this content, but they could well be? Although the specific definition of the 'profession' could vary between countries - I think the terms are still valid. Using the UK example: 305439002 | Under care of counselor (finding) - counselor mean something slightly different in AU compared to other countries (registered/training etc). But I can see it being useful, and not sure how else we or other countries would name it? What is the problem with it remaining in core? (it seems a low value change). |
CA | 2018-05-04 | Not in use in Canada. |
NL | 2018-05-08 | We do have some content of this in our extension, for example Under care of heart transplantation team (finding). But these concept are more to be able to model 'guidance or support after a heart transplantation' in the finding hierarchy. So we are OK when you inactivate the content and we will find a solution for this |
UK | 14-05-2018 | Thank you for clarifying that all content in this space is proposed for inactivation. As mentioned in the CMAG meeting this could cause issues for us and I don't see the issue with it remaining in the core. I would like to take this to our UK SNOMED CT Edition committee on the 5th June for a complete response. |
Member countries without a CMAG rep |
|
|
CMAG response
Date | CMAG Response | Next steps |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final outcome:
Date:
Copyright © 2025, SNOMED International