Feedback on CMAG 2022 Work Plan
Summary
Please provide feedback on the 2022 work plan. Feedback due by November 12th.
Actions:
Date | Requested action | Requester(s) | Response required by: | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 21, 2021 | Please provide feedback on the CMAG 2022 Work Plan | Cathy Richardson | Camilla Wiberg Danielsen Nov 12, 2021 Anna Harasim (Unlicensed) Nov 12, 2021 Elze de Groot (Unlicensed) Nov 12, 2021 Linda Parisien Nov 12, 2021 susannaprnn (Unlicensed) Nov 12, 2021 Former user (Deleted) Nov 12, 2021 Jostein Ven (Deactivated) Nov 12, 2021 Theresa Barry Nov 12, 2021 Libby Antoun (Unlicensed) Nov 12, 2021 Katrien Scheerlinck (Unlicensed) Nov 12, 2021 Eugene Viacrucis Nov 12, 2021 | Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments. |
Relevant documents
Links
Country response
Country | Date | Response |
|---|---|---|
USA | 20OCT2021 | The 2022 workplan is appropriate to the functioning of the CMAG group. It is intentionally generic and will be updated as specific issues arise. |
Sweden | 21OCT2021 | The 2022 workplan looks good. |
Denmark | 20211021 | Agree. |
Canada | 20211021 | No edits to propose. |
Australia | 20211101 | Nothing to add. |
UK | Nov 10, 2021 | No suggestions for a change |
Ireland | Nov 28 2021 | The workplan looks good, however for item 1 Provision of national perspectives on current SNOMED CT content projects and topics, does this mean perspective from NRC's on work happening at national level or the impact SI content may have on NRC's ? Otherwise looks good. |
New Zealand | 20211130 | The workplan looks good but turn around timeframes for advice to editorial board can be too tight- can we have a minimum to ensure we have time to investigate and contact subject matter experts and collate the feedback? |
Belgium | 20220110 | I agree. |
CMAG response
Date | CMAG Response | Next steps |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final outcome:
Date:
Comments
Cathy Richardson Hi Cathy, a minimum of four weeks? Over Christmas for example we are closed down for three weeks but I know that is not the same for northern hemisphere members . Getting hold of people can be difficult.
Following the request by Libby Antoun (Unlicensed) I just wanted to confirm we'll make 4 weeks the standard turnaround time. Where there are events such as Christmas or the business meetings we can look to adjust the timing further. If there is a work item you will need further time on please reach out to me.
That sounds good. Thank you!
Item 1 Provision of national perspectives on current SNOMED CT content projects and topics - work plan updated to clarify this means the impact of changes to international content on country extensions.
Turn around timeframes for advice to editorial board can be too tight - following up on this item. Libby Antoun (Unlicensed) what amount of time were you looking to request here?