2017 Changes to content
Summary
Request for input:
Feedback on the Content Development Roadmap
Depth of information required
Value of the Daily build information for Members
What do Member Countries see as substantive changes that they would like notification on in advance?
Date | Requested action | Requester(s) | Response required by: | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Links
Content Development Roadmap: unnamed link
Daily build: https://dailybuild.ihtsdotools.org/qa/
EAG discussion on substance changes: 2017-04-25 Editorial Advisory Group Face to Face Meeting
CMAG meeting: 2017-04-26 - CMAG Meeting - Face to face in London, England
Relevant documents
Actions:
Date | Requested action | Requester(s) | Response required by: | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
26 April 2017 |
| @Camilla Wiberg Danielsen Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas Jun 2, 2017 @Daniel Karlsson Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas Jun 2, 2017 @Elaine Wooler Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas Jun 2, 2017 @Elze de Groot Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas Jun 2, 2017 @Former user (Deleted) Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas Jun 2, 2017 @Linda Parisien Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas Jun 2, 2017 @Matt Cordell Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas Jun 2, 2017 @Former user (Deleted) Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas Jun 2, 2017 @Jostein Ven Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas Jun 2, 2017 | Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments. |
Country response
Country | Date | Response |
---|---|---|
Canada | 20170531 | Please find my comments in the attached file |
UK | 07/06/2017 | Apologies for not providing more detailed feedback. I presented this to our Implementation Forum on the 1st June and have asked for feedback. I agree with Linda's comments in section C of the type of changes we would like to see. For us this would also include changes to file structures or anything that might impact supplier load routines. High usage content areas are very important - it might be useful if we highlight some areas to you though some will be obvious I would think. The daily build is a very useful tool in particular the statistics and being able to drill down to see the detail behind the numbers. Overall this is a great advance in what used to be there and makes finding information a lot easier. |
Member countries without a CMAG rep |
CMAG response
Date | CMAG Response | Next steps |
---|---|---|
Final outcome:
Date:
Copyright © 2025, SNOMED International