2017-06-07 - SLPG Meeting
Date & Time
20:00 UTC Wednesday 7 June 2017
Teleconference Details
To join the meeting please go to https://snomed.zoom.us/j/471420169.
Further information can be found at SLPG meeting information
Goals
Review comments on SNOMED CT ECL v1.3
Progress the SNOMED CT Template Syntax
Attendees
Chair: Former user (Deleted)
Project Group: Anne Randorff Højen, Andrew Perry (Unlicensed), Former user (Deleted), Brian Carlsen, Daniel Karlsson, michael lawley, Alejandro Lopez Osornio
Apologies
Ed Cheetham
Agenda and Meeting Notes
Description | Owner | Notes |
|---|---|---|
Welcome, introductions and apologies | Former user (Deleted) |
|
Expression Constraint Language v1.3 | Former user (Deleted) | Refer to http://snomed.org/-ecl
|
SNOMED CT Template Syntax | Former user (Deleted) | Refer to http://snomed.org/-sts
|
Confirm next meeting date/time | Former user (Deleted) | Next meeting to be held at 20:00 UTC on Wednesday 21st June 2017 |
Hi All,
here are some questions:
to support expression repositories (i.e. where the substrate is dynamic in that expressions could be added), do we need to add the ability to use the ECL to apply constraint operators to post-coordinated expressions, i.e. where a piece of the ECL string is to be interpreted as a SCG expression, e.g. << [ 404684003 | Clinical finding (finding) |: 363698007 |Finding site (attribute)| = 10200004 | Liver structure (body structure) | ]? This would correspond to a DL query.
This is an example from the Observables project: If there is a property chain COMPONENT o HAS ACTIVE INGR. → COMPONENT then one could (DL) query for Observable:COMPONENT=Drug product but not using ECL as there are no (or very few) Observables with products, only substances.
to support potential expansion of the SNOMED CT logic profile, do we need to extend SCG to support axioms as opposed to only expressions, for example to allow (non-hidden) GCAs to be stated in SCG?
we need an SNOMED CT OWL specification, i.e. how is SNOMED CT (concepts and descriptions) represented in OWL. Is this within the scope of this group?
...and this is "thinking out loud" so please do not hesitate to be critical!
/Daniel