2018-12-11 - SNOMED on FHIR Meeting (TS)
Date
20:00 UTC on Tuesday 11 December 2018 - 90 minutes.
Objectives
FHIR Terminology Services and Resources
Meeting Details
Online: https://snomed.zoom.us/my/snomedhl7
Phone: See https://zoom.us/zoomconference for available phone numbers (meeting id 242-348-6949)
Chat: https://chat.snomedtools.org/channel/snomed-fhir
(instructions and guide here - Getting Started with Rocket Chat)
Attendees
@Rob Hausam, @michael lawley, @Peter Jordan, @Peter Williams, @Reuben Daniels, @Jane Millar, @Anne Randorff Højen, @Former user (Deleted), Gay Dolin, @Former user (Deleted)
Apologies
Meeting Recording
https://snomed.zoom.us/recording/share/D57exhJDH2hkUr6luQNcx_oytBg4RHep_BfPbFFuWDewIumekTziMw
Discussion items
Description | Mins | Owner | Notes & Actions | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Welcome and introductions | 5 | @Peter Williams @Rob Hausam | Recording & notes. |
2 | Summary of previous week and previous fortnight | 5 | @Peter Williams @Rob Hausam | |
3 | Publication of FHIR Free Set | 20 | @Peter Williams | @Rob Hausam reach out to Jay and Keith at the VA to elicit use cases / requirements - any update? Considering question of 'who publishes what', RH thought SI should publish a refset as the authoritative source which HL7 could then use to derive FHIR friendly forms eg Concept Map. Question for GG: What is the use case for the mapping? This gives context to the question of how (and by whom) the map is maintained. Agreement being drafted this week for both FHIR and IPS Free Sets (but can be de-coupled if required). |
4 | Completed Tasks | 5 | @Peter Williams | On Hold / Maintenance |
5 | SNOMED FHIR Implementation Guide | 10 | @Peter Williams | Progressing the SNOMED Implementation Guide and specific guidance of "Best Practice" of using SNOMED with FHIR. Can we include tests for 'correctness' - using existing FHIR Testing platforms? https://github.com/IHTSDO/snomed-ig with the built view hosted by GitHub at https://ihtsdo.github.io/snomed-ig/ Tooling: Current tooling appears to be solely command line based. See also Snapper for value set editing (currently STU3). @Peter Williams reference hosted build in Readme. What is the scope of content for the guide? Targeting "Best Practice" for FHIR Implementers using SNOMED CT. Possible layered approach and potentially strict (for internal record keeping and communication) vs permissive profiles when . General guidance for bindings or specific details on each resource. Audiences - Developer vs User of implemented services. ML Suggests single entry point document with multiple paths through the documentation. |
6 | DL Enhancements on PCEs | 10 | @Peter Williams | How can we represent the definition of a concept as a Post Coordinated Expression given that NNF may not fully express the stated form. MAG work item: DL Enhancements impact on Post Coordinated Expressions Zulip enquiry has not yet suggested anyone using the returned expressions for anything more involved than straight forward display - although there's no way to be sure. FHIR property lookup does allow for role grouping by using nested properties (candidate topic for implementation guide! PJ) Languages group next meeting could be into the new year. MAG meeting 3rd week in January 2019. |
7 | SNOMED with FHIR | 10 | @Peter Jordan @michael lawley | Revisit 4.2.1.0 Using SNOMED CT with FHIR All participants are invited to review this local copy of that page.
Update October 9
@Peter Williams move into Maintenance section. Further discussion could be cross pollinated with the implementation guide. Outstanding question about the guidance on NNF? SnoChilliesserver does return this value, for example. @michael lawley raise tracker item for the removal of this section (link here). @Rob Hausam to progress. |
8 | Ongoing items | 10 | @Peter Jordan @michael lawley |
|
9 | Mechanism for working with Languages. | 15 | @Reuben Daniels | HL7 Vocab Item: https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=15806 ML: Supplement would hopefully only add additional descriptions that are not described in the base content. Precedence (fallback) for multiple language reference sets only really discussed in Languages Group for ECL - other use cases not yet brought to light. Update 28 Aug: Keen to see an implementation using Supplements to see how it would actually work. Option to explore this at Baltimore Connectathon? Update 11 Dec: HTTP Headers RFC 5646 (Tags for identifying languages). Suggestion that where dialects are to be referenced which do no have a standard code, one could be constructed, either using new letters or the language reference set id directly eg en-nz-x-12345601 Language reference set could be an implicit code system supplement. Update 11 September Do we need a parameter for the expand operation for this - Reuben looking into this currently. |
10 | Any other business
|
|
| Next Meeting: Tuesday 8 January 2019 Actions for next week: Any suggestions for San Antonio Connectathon January 13 2019?
|
Meeting Files
Copyright © 2025, SNOMED International