Morphologic Abnormalities vs. Findings

Concepts from the Morphologic Abnormality hierarchy should not be used in place of concepts from the Clinical Findings hierarchy, even though they appear to refer to similar clinical situations.

• For example,

  • {"timestamp":1757977035776,"msg":"A unknown Exception Occurred","errorMsg":"The provided AtlassianHostUser did not specify a user to act as.","code":"500"}
     is not a finding, but
    {"timestamp":1757977035791,"msg":"A unknown Exception Occurred","errorMsg":"The provided AtlassianHostUser did not specify a user to act as.","code":"500"}
     is a finding

Morphologies are used as the values of the defining attributes of findings and procedures. Findings are used to represent the combination of a morphology and a location.

• For example,

  • {"timestamp":1757977035783,"msg":"A unknown Exception Occurred","errorMsg":"The provided AtlassianHostUser did not specify a user to act as.","code":"500"}
     represents cystic type of morphology that has the location, scalp

Many morphologies have names that could be misinterpreted as implying a process rather than a structure.

• Inflammation might mean the structural-morphologic features of inflammation, such as inflammatory cell infiltrates; or it might mean the process that causes the structural changes. Within the morphologic abnormality hierarchy, the structural interpretation is intended, not the process interpretation.